Should everyone carry guns?
Some say only criminals should
By Andrew deRenzy
Tuesday, July 28th, 2009, 6:14It seems the Miami Herald doesn’t get it. E.J Dionne goes on about removing the metal detectors in the Capitol building almost like he is planning something…
Law-abiding citizens have the right to keep and bear arms and limiting this right has shown that crime increases, that is a non negotiable fact. Every new gun restriction law serves two purposes: to make legal gun owners jump through one more pointless hoop, and provide prosecuters with another plea bargain they can use to get rid of all the violent crime cases these laws are not preventing. 40% of criminals feared an armed victim, the remaining 60% gets lower as we get tougher on the real criminals and arm ourselves with weapons our forefathers couldn’t even begin to fathom. The bottom line, every law-abiding citizen has the right to arms. I’d feel safer for my senators if they were carrying guns, especially with you around, E.J. However our bloated government has so many people going into the building it would not be wise to remove the metal detectors. You see bombs render guns useless, and I wish to protect the lives of all our senators, don’t you Mr. Dionne?
Related Posts
Gun Applications in Israel DoubleHow to Call Your Congressman Out at a Town Hall
Open Carry NH Man Under Fire From All Sides
Democrats are the racists.
Filed under guns. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Lori says:
August 6th, 2009
7:21 am
It is not the legal gun owners who commit the crimes, it is the criminals, (who by the way can not get a gun license.) If you take teh guns away from all of the law abidding citizens then the only ones who will have guns are teh bad guys who get them illeaglely.